← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23336/2020allowed

Hardeep Yadav @ Hardeep Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2021-03-22Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23336 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2019 Thana- RANIYATALAB District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Hardeep Yadav @ Hardeep Singh, aged about 60 years, Male, Son of Late Ram Raj Yadav 2.

Balwant Kumar, aged about 22 years, Male, son of Hardeep Yadav 3.

Laloo Yadav @ Shankar Kumar Singh @ Shankar Kumar, aged about 24 years, Male, son of Hardeep Yadav All resident of Village-Lasari, P.S.-Agiawan, District-Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr.Manoranjan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Uma Nath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 22-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection with Ranitalab P.S. Case No.154 of 2019 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. The allegation against the petitioners and others is that they assaulted the informant side in connection with dispute for loading sand from Ghat of the informant. Learned counsel for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23336 of 2020(3) dt.22-03-2021 2/2 the petitioners with reference to Annexure-3 would submit that the parties have settled the dispute and they have submitted a joint compromise petition. It is submitted that the offence is non-bailable but Annexure-3 is relevant for the purpose of bail. Considering the compromise petition (Annexure-3) for the purpose of bail, this Court is inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Let petitioners, above-named, in the event of arrest or surrender within one month from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Mr. P.K. Malviya, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Danapur, Patna in connection with Ranitalab P.S. Case No. 154 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) BT/- U T