Radhika Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22824 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-173 Year-2018 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas ====================================================== RADHIKA DEVI Wife of Dharmu Ram Resident of Village- Mednipur, P.S.- Sasaram (Mufasil), District- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 11-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 304(B) IPC registered in connection with Sasaram (Mufasil) P.S. Case No. 173/2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated merely because she happens to be the mother-in-law of the deceased. It is submitted that the husband of the deceased is already in custody since 06.10.2018. The petitioner is living separately along with her elder son having no concern with the day-to-day matters of the deceased and her son. The deceased has committed suicide due to dispute with her husband. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioner's arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Sasaram (Mufasil) P.S. Case No. 173/2018 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22824 of 2019(2) dt.11-04-2019 2/2 i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner. ii. That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make herself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioner shall be well represented in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, her bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T