← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26209/2026dismissed

Randhir Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-02Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26209 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2023 Thana- KALUAHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Randhir Singh Son of Late Saryug Singh R/o Village - Chechar, Near Brahm, Ward no. 2, P.S. - Bidupur, Dist.- Vaishali at Hajipur. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Kaushal Kumar Singh Son of Thakkan Singh R/o Village - Narar Navtoli, P.S. - Kaluahi, Dist. - Madhubani.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Dhananjai Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP For the Opp. Party No.2 :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2.

2.

The present application has been filed for cancellation of bail granted to the opposite party no.2 vide order dated 31.01.2026 passed by this Court in Criminal Miscellaneous No.84780 of 2025.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the opposite party no.2 has obtained the bail order from this Court by making false statement. The petitioner also alleges threat at the hands of the accused persons.

4.

Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has submitted that after grant of bail, the opposite party no.2 has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26209 of 2026(3) dt.02-07-2026 2/2 not threatened any witness or the informant and in this regard, there is no complaint against him.

5.

Considering the facts of the case, I am not inclined to cancell the bail granted to the opposite party no.2 as the petitioner has not been able to show any supervening circumstance for cancelling the bail of the opposite party no.2. Accordingly, this application is rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to produce the witnesses on the dates fixed in the trail.

6.

In case, the petitioner approaches the Superintendent of Police, Vaishali for protection of witnesses, the same should be provided to the witnesses by the Vaishali Police, who will accompany the witnesses to the trial in Madhubani district and after the deposition is recorded, they will drop the witnesses to their house.

7.

Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Superintendent of Police, Vaishali, forthwith through FAX or e-mail for its compliance.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T