Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24364/2023bail rejected

Sujit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-18Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24364 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-530 Year-2022 Thana- GRIYAK District- Nalanda ====================================================== Sujit Kumar, Son of Sri Chauhan, R/V- Bishunpur Beldari, PS- Manpur DistNalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 18-05-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Giriyak P.S. Case no. 530/2022 registered under section 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, it is stated by the informant that his vehicle was overtaken by two accused persons on a motorcycle and on the point of pistol, the informant was dispossessed of his articles including his mobile phone etc. as mentioned in detail in the F.I.R.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The petitioner is in custody since 21.11.2022 and charge-sheet already having been submitted in the case, there is no purpose in keeping him behind the bars. He has no criminal antecedent and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24364 of 2023(2) dt.18-05-2023 2/2 undertakes to cooperate in the trial.

5. Learned A.P.P for the State opposing the prayer for bail of the petitioner submits that besides the petitioner confessing his guilt, he has also been identified in the T.I.Parade.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation in the F.I.R together with the petitioner having been identified in the T.I.Parade, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.

7. In view of the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent, liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

(Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U T