Vikram Kumar Verma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22688 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1115 Year-2025 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Vikram Kumar Verma S/o Late Dilip Kumar Verma Resident of Mohalla - Main Road, Near Vishwanath Market @ Vishnath Market Jehanabad, Police Station - Jehanabad, District - Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Informant : Mr. Jogendra Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-04-2026 Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Jogendra Kumar, learned counsel for the Informant and Mr. Yogendra Kumar, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 05.02.2026, in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 1115 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 24.10.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he has assaulted by means of khanti on the head of the informant due to which he sustained injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22688 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026 2/3 present case. It appears from the F.I.R. itself that due to some petty dispute the present occurrence had taken place. Although there is specific allegation in the F.I.R. against the petitioner that he has assaulted to the informant by means of khanti and he has received injury. He further submits that due to spur of moment the present occurrence had taken place and there was no intention to kill anyone and the petitioner is in custody since 05.02.2026.

5. Learned counsel for the Informant as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, on the other hand, vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries one one more case other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is on bail in the pending matter.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 1115 of 2025, subject to the following conditions :-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22688 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026 3/3

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T