Lakshman Paswan @ Pokiya v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26982 of 2026 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32939 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-442 Year-2024 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada ====================================================== Lakshman Paswan @ Pokiya S/O Late Dwarika Paswan Resident Of Village - Nayatola Sangatper, P.S- Bakhtiyarpur, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The present application has been filed for modification of the order dated 11.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32939 of 2025 by which the petitioner was granted bail in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 442 of 2024, to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-VI, Nawada.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 11.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 32939 of 2025 the petitioner was granted bail after framing of charge, if not already framed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that out of six accused persons, five accused persons have been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26982 of 2026(3) dt.01-05-2026 2/2 released on bail and out of them some are absconding and as a result, due to the said reason charges against the petitioner have not yet been framed for the last seven months and nor are likely to be framed in future. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, submits that it has been more than seven months since the petitioner was granted bail but his bail bonds could not be furnished due to the said reason. Learned counsel for the petitioner, therefore, prays that the said condition imposed in paragraph no. 8 of the aforesaid bail order be modified.
4. Having perused the record and considered the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court finds no reason to interfere with the aforesaid order.
5. Accordingly, the modification application is dismissed.
6. Learned Trial Court is directed to take necessary steps for framing of charge against the petitioner. (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T