Prahlad Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 32861 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2019 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Prahlad Kumar Son of Sri Gopal Jee Resident of Village- Taripar P.S. Bikram District Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Rajesh Kumar Son of Sri Yogesh Singh Resident of Village- Neriya, Post Office- Chiksi, Police Station- Sigori, District-Patna 3.
Smt. Soni Devi Wife of Sri Rajesh Kumar Resident of Village- Neriya, Post Office- Chiksi, Police Station- Sigori, District-Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Devi Das Srivastava, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-07-2026 Service of notice is treated as valid, as the father of O.P. No. 2 has received the notice.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
3. The present application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the O.P. Nos. 2 & 3 vide order dated 07.02.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Danapur, Patna in A.B.P. No. 8446 of 2022.
4. Perused the records.
5. Having considered the submissions of the parties
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 32861 of 2024(6) dt.23-07-2026 2/2 and the materials available on record, this Court finds that no supervening circumstance has been brought on record to show that O.P. Nos. 2 & 3 have misused the privilege of bail or violated any of the conditions imposed by the learned court below. No material has been placed before this Court to justify interference with the order granting bail. Therefore, this Court finds no sufficient ground to interfere with the impugned order.
6. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed.
7. However, the learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of this order. The learned Trial Court shall submit a compliance report before this Court after expiry of the said period.
8. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Patna through FAX or e-mail for immediate compliance.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) sadique/- U T