Md. Jasim v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.79023 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2018 Thana- PALASI District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Jasim S/o Late Halim R/vill-Barhat, P.S-Palasi, Distt.-Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Naushad Uzzoha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Palasi P.S. Case No. 177 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has alleged that in the night of 27.06.2018 his buffalo was taken away by some unknown miscreants and on 28.06.2018 during search being made by him and his family members stolen buffalo was recovered from the possession of petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner never stolen buffalo of the informant. Petitioner is in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.79023 of 2018(2) dt.30-01-2019 2/2 custody since 29.06.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. VI, Araria, in connection with Palasi P.S. Case No. 177 of 2018 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T