Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25924/2026bail granted

Dipraj @ Dipendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-04-20Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25924 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-249 Year-2025 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Dipraj @ Dipendra kumar Son of Ramayodhya Prasad Resident of Village - Bela Nirpur, P.S.- Chiraiya, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Prateek Tandon, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 249 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. The case of the prosecution is that on 15.04.2025, the son of the informant was taken to Pakaridayal by the petitioner and subsequently, he was informed that the son of the informant had meet with an accident. The informant suspected that the petitioner had killed his son.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25924 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026 2/2 case. The petitioner is in custody since 23.10.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. From the materials available on record and the statement of the witnesses, it appears to be a case of accidental death of the deceased.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Motihari, East Champaran/ concerned Court in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 249 of 2025.

8. It is, however, clarified that the observations made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express any opinion on the merits of the case.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T