Kashi Nath Ray @ Kashi Nath v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7965 of 2025 ====================================================== 1.

Kashi Nath Ray @ Kashi Nath Son of Parma Ray, Resident of villageBahrauli, P.O.- Bahrauli, P.S.- Mashrak, District- Saran at Chapra-841417. 2.

Upendra Ray, Son of Parma Ray Resident of village- Bahrauli, P.O.- Bahrauli, P.S.- Mashrak, District- Saran at Chapra- 841417. 3.

Sunil Ray, Son of Parma Ray Resident of village- Bahrauli, P.O.- Bahrauli, P.S.- Mashrak, District- Saran at Chapra- 841417. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Divisional Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra. 3.

The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra. 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra. 5.

The Additional Collector, Saran at Chapra.

6.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Marhaura, Saran.

7.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Marhaura, Saran. 8.

The Circle Officer, Mashrak, Saran.

9.

The Block Development Officer, Mashrak, Saran. 10.

The Station House Officer, Mashrak Police Station, District- Saran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jeetendra Narayan, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 22-06-2026 Heard Mr. Jeetendra Narayan, learned counsel for the petitioner. There is no representation from the State.

2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s):

(i) for quashing the Notice dated 04.03.2025 (Annexure-9) and entire proceeding passed in Jamabandi Cancellation

Patna High Court CWJC No.7965 of 2025(2) dt.22-06-2026 2/3 Case No. 311 of 2024-25 (The State through Circle Officer, Mashrak Vs. Kashi Nath Ray and others) issued by the Additional Collector, Saran at Chapra (Respondent No. 5) whereby the said respondent directed to the petitioners that Jamabandi Cancellation Case initiated relating to Jamabandi No. 1221, running in the name of Late Mahesh Rout, VillageBahrauli its Revenue Thana No. 16, connecting Khata No. 46, Survey Plot No. 2170 admeasuring in Area of 9 Katha 8 dhur under Revenue Circle/ Block- Mashrak in the District of Saran.

II. For directing the respondents to not disturb the peaceful possession of the petitioners upon the abovementioned subject land situated under Khata No. 46, Survey Plot No. 2170 admeasuring in Area of 9 Katha 8 dhur bounded Khand, as in North-Ramkishun Rout in South East- Road, West- Ramkishun under Jamabandi No. 1221 which is running in the name of Grandfather of the petitioners namely Late Mahesh Rout of the subject land on the basis of Patta dated 25 वैशाखसन्1352 साल (1942AD) situated under Revenue Circle / Block - Mashrak in the District of Saran because the said Jamabandi is running since very long which has been protected by mandates of Hon'ble Court passed in a cases of Ramanandan Singh Vs. The State of Bihar, Jagarnath Jha Vs. the State of Bihar, Nathuni

Patna High Court CWJC No.7965 of 2025(2) dt.22-06-2026 3/3 Singh and others Vs. the State of Bihar and others and Bhola Das Vs. State of Bihar.

III. And any other writ(s), order(s), direction(s) to which the petitioner which may deem just proper and necessary in view of the facts and circumstances discussed herein under.

3. The counter affidavit of the Circle Officer, Mashrak, Saran shows that though Jamabandi Cancellation Case No. 311 of 2024-25 has been instituted, only notice has been issued to the petitioner and aggrieved, the writ petition.

4. This Court is also of the opinion that when the matter is still pending before the Additional Collector, Saran at Chapra, it would be appropriate that petitioner present all the facts/ documents under their belt so that an appropriate reasoned order can be passed.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that appropriate steps shall be taken to appear/ contest the matter.

6. Taking note of the aforesaid fact, the writ petition is disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U