Gajendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23965 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-321 Year-2025 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== Gajendra Singh Son of Sagarnath Singh S/O Village- Lipta, P.S- Partapur, Distt.- Chatra, State- Jharkhand.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Niranjan Parihar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nayay Sanhita.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant is the driver of the truck who was going from Kolkata to Hapur (UP) carrying chicken feed in a container worth Rs.13,80,000. It is alleged that on 13.11.2025 at about 8:30 P.M. after having dinner, went to little distance then suddenly white colour KIA intercepted the truck and they forcibly made captive the informant and got seated in that car at a gun point. It is alleged that when the informant went to his container, the chicken feed worth Rs.13,80,000/- was not there in that container.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23965 of 2026(3) dt.19-06-2026 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case It is further submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR rather his name has transpired on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, namely, Md. Aftab who has been granted bail by this court vide Cr. Misc. No. 23534 of 2026. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 25.11.2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 321 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Sherghati, Gayaji.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) shubham/- U T