Naina Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24944 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2311 Year-2018 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.
Naina Devi Wife Of Shardanand Upadhyay Village- Trilokawa Ps- Kesariya Dist- East Champaran 2.
Smt. Manju Devi Wife Of Chandeshwar Tiwari Village- Lakhnauri PsDeoariya Dist- Muzaffarpur 3.
Indu Devi Wife Of Lalita Tiwari Village- Dariya Chhapra Ps- Motipur DistMuzaffarpur 4.
Smt. Chandrakali Devi Wife Of Lalu Upadhyay Village- Trilokawa PsKewariya Dist- East Champaran 5.
Usha Devi Wife Of Harendra Pandey Village- Dilawarpur Ps- Kesariya DistEast Champaran 6.
Harendra Pandey Son Of Late Prabhu Pandey Village- Dilawarpur PsKesariya Dist- East Champaran 7.
Amrendra Kumar Son Of Nawal Kishore Kuar Village- Dilawarpur PsKesariya Dist- East Champaran 8.
Rajanikant Pandey Son Of Harendra Pandey Village- Dilawarpur PsKesariya Dist- East Champaran 9.
Ravikant Pandey Son Of Harendra Pandey Village- Dilawarpur Ps- Kesariya Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
Abhay Pandey Son Of Vinod Pandey Village- Dilawarpur Ps- Kesariya DistEast Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Suraj Kumar Tiwari Mr. Shambhu Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-09-2024 This is an application for quashing of the order dated 13.02.2023 passed in Cr. Revision No. 318 of 2019 by which the Court below had dismissed the Cr. Revision No. 318 of 2019
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24944 of 2023(3) dt.26-09-2024 2/2 which was filed against the cognizance order dated 03.10.2019 by which the Court below took cognizance against the accused persons.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner; Suraj Kumar Tiwari prays for withdrawing this application.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T