Rajesh Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26171 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1137 Year-2022 Thana- NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE District- Nawada ====================================================== Rajesh Chauhan SON OF ARJUN CHAUHAN Resident of VillageLakshmipur, P.S. -Dhamaul (Pakriwaran) District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

ANSHU DEVI WIFE OF RAJESH CHAUHAN Resident of VillageLakshmipur, P.S. -Dhamaul (Pakriwaran) District- Nawada At present village- Gangati, ps- pakariwaran (warwan), dist- Nawada ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manmohan Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP For the Complainant :

Mr. Arjun Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the complainant.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 323, 498(A), 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. Petitioner, who is husband of complainant, is said to have tortured and ousted her from the matrimonial home in association of his family members over the dowry demand of one Apache Motorcycle.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26171 of 2024(4) dt.18-11-2024 2/3 that the petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has neither made any dowry demand nor drove her out of her matrimonial home nor tormented her over the demand of dowry. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is still ready to keep her with full honour and dignity. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006 (3) PLJR 182.

5. In that view of the matter, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No. 1137 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.,

6. Petitioner is ready to pay Rs.3,000.00 (Rupees Three Thousand) per month to the complainant in the second week of every month. If the petitioner fails to pay the aforesaid amount on two consecutive months, complainant shall be at liberty to move before the learned Court below for cancelling the bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26171 of 2024(4) dt.18-11-2024 3/3 bond of the petitioner.

7. It goes without saying that the aforesaid payment shall be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial maintenance case or any other collateral proceedings.

8. Learned counsel for the complainant is directed to furnish the bank account details of the complainant in the learned Court below. If she fails to furnish the same, the aforesaid amount will be deposited in the learned Court below which will be released in favour of the complainant after she furnishes her bank account details.

9. If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the learned Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Center for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

10. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this application stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) priyanka/- U T