Ajit Raut @ Ajit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26873 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2024 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.
Ajit Raut @ Ajit Kumar SON OF BUTAI RAUT @ NANDE RAUT Resident of Village- Balwapar, P.S. Warisaliganj, District- Nawada 2.
SUDHIR RAUT @ SUDHIR KUMAR SON OF BUTAI RAUT @ NANDE RAUT Resident of Village- Balwapar, P.S. Warisaliganj, District- Nawada 3.
VICKY RAUT @ VICKY KUMAR @ SHASHIKANT KUMAR SON OF BRIJI RAUT @ BRIJNANDAN RAUT Resident of Village- Balwapar, P.S. Warisaliganj, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Manmohan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 337, 338, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Petitioners are said to have fired upon the informant and his uncle.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He submits that there is general and omnibus
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26873 of 2024(2) dt.01-05-2024 2/2 allegation levelled against the petitioners. He submits that similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 22.04.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21868 of 2024. He further submits that petitioners have one criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 28 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T