Amarjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22908 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2026 Thana- RAJGIR District- Nalanda ====================================================== Amarjeet Kumar Son of Krishan Murari R/o- Murarpur, P.S.- Korma, Dist.- Shekhpura, Currently Residing at Nai Sarai Patel Nagar, Bihar, Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akash Shankar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ajay Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-04-2026 Heard Mr. Akash Shankar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ajay Mishra, learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 08.02.2026, in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 86 of 2026, F.I.R. dated 07.02.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he was found impersonating appearing in the CTET Examination in place of one Chanchal Kumar.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. As per allegation in the F.I.R., the petitioner was found impersonating appearing in the CTET Examination in place of one Chanchal Kumar. Learned counsel

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22908 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/3 for the petitioner submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. and he has been made accused merely on the basis of suspicion and except the suspicion, nothing has come during investigation to suggest the involvement of the petitioner in the present occurrence. The petitioner is in custody since 08.02.2026.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner having clean antecedent and he has been made accused merely on the basis of suspicion, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Biharsharif Court (Nalanda) in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case No. 86 of 2026, subject to the following conditions :-

(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22908 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 3/3 reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U T