Mahadeo Yadav @ Uttam Raj v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21893 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-784 Year-2018 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== MAHADEO YADAV @ UTTAM RAJ Son of Balkrishna Yadav Resident of Village - Kantahi, P.S.- Gwalpara, District - Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amitesh Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-07-2020 Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding.

The matter has been listed under the heading 'For Orders' under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks from the date of lifting of the lockdown in the State of Bihar.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 366(a), 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case in short is that the accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21893 of 2020(2) dt.10-07-2020 2/3 persons kidnapped the daughter of the informant who has left the house left for school.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 3.1.2020. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Chargesheet has been submitted in the present case. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. On recovery, the statement of the victim has been recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in which she has stated that she was taken by the petitioner to get married. There is no allegation of sexual or physical abuse alleged against the petitioner. The victim happens to be shali (sister-in-law) of the petitioner. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Madhepura in connection with Madhepura (Bharruchi O.P.) P.S. Case No. 784/2018. Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of four

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21893 of 2020(2) dt.10-07-2020 3/3 weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T