Laxman Sah And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25925 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -110 Year- 2017 Thana -SITAMARHI District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Laxman Sah, Son of Bhutta Sah @ Raj Nandan Sah,

2. Nathuni Sah @ Pawan Sah, Son of Bhutta Sah @ Raj Nandan Sah Both R/o Ward No.2, Riga Road, P.S. & District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No.110 of 2017, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366A, 341, 323 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The Statement of the victim-girl itself indicates the manner she was taken to the Nepal territory in an unconscious state and forcibly married with Kishan Kumar. At that time, the father and uncle of Kishan Kumar i.e. the present petitioners were also present and later on, she was sexually assaulted by Kishan Kumar.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25925 of 2017 (3) dt.10-08-2017 2/2 Looking to the nature of allegation, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T