← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29034/2023disposed

Rajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-05-18Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29034 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2022 Thana- PIPRA District- East Champaran ====================================================== RAJESH KUMAR Son of Amerika Sahani @ Amerika Choudhary Resident of village - Hathiyahi, P.S.- Pipra Kothi, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-05-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 303 of 2022, dated 17.10.2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 41(i) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The main submissions advanced by petitioner's counsel are that the instant matter relates to the recovery of 26 litres of country-made illicit wine but as per allegation this petitioner and one other co-accused person were carrying the alleged liquor on a motorcycle but on seeing the police party they fled away and admittedly this petitioner was not arrested at the spot and his name was disclosed by local people who gathered at the place of recovery and the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 13.02.2023 and he was remanded in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29034 of 2023(2) dt.18-05-2023 2/2 present matter from Pipra P.S. Case No. 28 of 2023 and thereafter he was remanded in several other cases one after another and the seizure list witnesses are not independent persons and against the petitioner investigation has been completed.

4. Per contra, the learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the materials available on record and also the completion of investigation against the petitioner, I deem it fit and proper to admit the petitioner to the privilege of bail.

6. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be enlarged on bail after framing of charge, if the same has not been framed, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 303 of 2022.

(Shailendra Singh, J.) maynaz/- U T