← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22273/2025bail granted

Santosh Kumar Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-09Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22273 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2025 Thana- Excise Benipatti District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Santosh Kumar Gupta S/o- Ganesh Prasad R/o - Kataia, ward No.17, P.S - Benipatti, District - Madhubani 2.

Lakshman Kumar Thakur S/o- Uttim Thakur Village- Balanja W.No-5, PsPatauna Dist- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Benipatti Excise P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, 234 liters liquor was recovered from two motorcycles and both the petitioners were apprehended on spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22273 of 2025(2) dt.09-04-2025 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that the petitioners are not the registered owner of the motorcycles in question. It is further submitted that the petitioners were a passerby of that way and was arrested on the basis of suspicion. The petitioners are in custody since 11.02.2025. Petitioner No. 1 has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail and petitioner no. 2 has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Benipatti Excise P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T