Radha Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23111 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-428 Year-2022 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.
Radha Devi W/O Late Paltu Rai R/O Village- Bhagwatipur, P.S- Ahiyapur, Dist.- Muzaffarpur.
2.
Radha Devi W/O Late Paltu Rai R/O Village- Bhagwatipur, P.S- Ahiyapur, Dist.- Muzaffarpur.
3.
Rinju Devi W/O Triveni Ray R/O Village- Bhagwatipur, P.S- Ahiyapur, Dist.- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Hans Lal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 22-04-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 447, 341, 323, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and are women and the informant alleges that on 17.5.2022 at 9.00 P.M., five named accused persons including the petitioners came on account of dispute which had arisen in between the children and started abusing. On objection, all accused assaulted him by lathi, danda and bricks causing injury on head and Ashok Rai took out of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23111 of 2026(3) dt.22-04-2026 2/2 Rs.20,000/- and when people gathered accused fled.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that no specific allegation of assault is alleged against the petitioners rather the allegation against them are general and omnibus in nature.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Ahiyapur P. S. Case No.428 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T