Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28720 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2023 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar Yadav S/o- Sikendra Yadav R/o- VillagePhulkaha Ward no 20, PS- Jadiya, Distt- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shahid Aqubal For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 26-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, some unknown miscreants came on motorcycles stopped the informant's pick-up van and on the point of pistol snatched his cash, documents, mobile, key of pick-up van and other articles.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and the same has been lodged against unknown persons. The name of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of confessional
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28720 of 2024(2) dt.26-04-2024 2/2 statement of co-accused persons. He submitted that no T.I. Parade has been done. On the basis of suspicion, petitioner has been implicated in the present case. Similarly situated other accused person has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 15.12.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 81090 of 2023. He is languishing in judicial custody since 01.08.2023.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Supaul in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 178 of 2023.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U