← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16658/2015dfd for non appearance

Arun Kumar Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-01-02Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16658 of 2015 ====================================================== 1.

Arun Kumar Singh and Ors Son of Late Baban Bihari Singh Resident of Village-Ahiraulia, P.OI.-Bhopatpur, P.S.-Kothia, District-East Champaran. 2.

Punyadeo Ram Son of Late Raj Ram Resident of Village-Araji Nanhlear, P.S.-Harisidhi, District-East Champaran.

3.

Md. Serajuddin Son of Nabi Mohammad, Resident of Village-Gobindpur Via-Areraj, P.S.-Harshidhi, District-East Champaran. 4.

Suresh Narayan Baitha Son of Late Baitha, Resident of Mohalla-New Chandmari, P.S.-Motihari Town, District-East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Additional Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Bihar Public Service Commission, through its Secretary, 15 Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Baily Road, P 5.

The Bihar Public Service Commission, through its Secretary, 15 Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Baily Road, P ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For BPSC :

Mr. Zaidi Haider, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Sanjay Parasmani,AC to GP-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 02-01-2024 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners although the State is present.

2. The petitioners have moved before this Court for quashing of the letter 10.4.2015 issued by the respondent -Bihar Public Service Commission as also has made prayer for allowing the Commission to let them appear in the interview.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the Commission

Patna High Court CWJC No.16658 of 2015(2) dt.02-01-2024 2/2 submits that the entire process has been completed and the writ petition has become infructuous.

4. Be that as it may, since no one has appeared for the petitioners, the writ petition stands dismissed for nonprosecution. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U