Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26922/2014bail granted

Md. Kabil v. The State Of Bihar

2015-09-23Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26922 of 2014 (4) dt.23-09-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26922 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -81 Year- 2012 Thana -KHAGARIA COMPALINT CASE DistrictKHAGARIA ====================================================== Md. Kabil S/o Late Md. Tahir, Resident of village - Dighoun, P.S. Beldour, District - Khagaria .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Jahan Ara Khatoon W/o md. Kabil, D/o Md. Siraj, resident of VillageTarha, P.S. Salkhua (Banna Itahari) Dist- Saharsa. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 23-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Complaint Case No. 81C of 2012.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and this is the first such grievance raised since the parties were married in the year 1998.. The petitioner expresses his willingness to keep the opposite party no. 2 with due dignity and honour.

4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 appears and also expresses willingness on her part to accompany with the petitioner if she is kept properly.

5. Pursuant to order dated 26.08.2015, both

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26922 of 2014 (4) dt.23-09-2015 parties are personally present and agree that they would be leaving the Court premises together, reiterating their commitment to resume their conjugal life in harmonious manner.

6. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner by order dated 19.11.2014 stands confirmed. However, in case a fresh complaint/F.I.R. of similar nature is filed by the opposite party no. 2 against the petitioner at any time prior to conclusion of the trial, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner shall stand automatically cancelled. (Vikash Jain, J) Md. Ibrarul/- U T