Md Samir v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24437 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2025 Thana- Manikpur District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.
Md Samir Son of Md. Bablu @ Razi Ahmad R/O Village- Haldi, P.S.- Manikpur, Distt.- Lakhisarai 2.
Md. Aajad @ Md. Azaz Son of Md. Bablu @ Razi Ahmad R/O VillageHaldi, P.S.- Manikpur, Distt.- Lakhisarai 3.
Md. Bablu @ Razi Ahmad Son of Md. Hado @ Md. Hadikuddin R/O Village- Haldi, P.S.- Manikpur, Distt.- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Parmanand Pd. Nr. Sahi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-04-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. appearing for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Manikpur P.S. Case No.80 of 2025, for allegedly having committed offences under Sections 126, 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per the written report submitted by the informant, on 19.07.2025 at about 09:00 p.m., while he was returning after offering Namaz, he saw a motorcycle parked near his house, which belonged to Md. Meraz. When the informant requested him to remove the said motorcycle, Md.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24437 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 2/3 Meraz called his other associates, including the petitioners and all of them started assaulting the informant. The petitioners are said to have assaulted with Lathi while the other accused persons assaulted the informant with fists and slaps.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is case and counter case in between the parties for the same occurrence. Manikpur P.S. Case No.81 of 2025 was also lodged against the informant and his family members by the accused side and finally amicable settlement has been reached in between the parties, for which a compromise petition has already been filed before the court of the learned District & Sessions Judge, Lakhisarai. It is further submitted that other coaccused persons have been granted bail by the learned court below itself. The injuries sustained by the informant is on nose. It is also submitted that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent.
5. The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, it transpires that there is case and counter case in between the parties and the parties have compromised the case in between them. The injuries sustained
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24437 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026 3/3 by the informant is on nose.
7. Taking into consideration the facts aforesaid, let the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IInd, Lakhisarai in connection with Manikpur P.S. Case No.80 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. with a further condition that:- The learned court concerned shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedent, the court concerned shall take steps for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Ritesh Kumar, J.) Sanjay/- U T