Aniket Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1159 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-518 Year-2018 Thana- LAHERIYASARAI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Aniket Kumar Paswan, s/o Vijay Paswan, resident of Village - Mirzapur Koaahi, P.S. Bahadurpur, District, Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shama Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Laheria Sarai P.S. Case No. 518/2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379/411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is stealing mobile of informant and was caught when he was fleeing away and the stolen mobile was recovered from his possession and two other mobiles which were also said to be stolen were also recovered. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case as he has altercation with the informant and his mother also works as a Sweeper in the said hospital. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 17.10.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1159 of 2019(2) dt.24-01-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Darbhanga in connection with Laheria Sarai P.S. Case No. 518/2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T