← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1166/2019bail granted

Anoj Kr. Yadav @ Anoj Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2019-01-21Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1166 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2017 Thana- SIKTI District- Araria ====================================================== Anoj Kr. Yadav @ Anoj Kumar Yadav son of Pandav Lal Yadav Resident of Village - Bhorha P.S. Terhagach District- Kishanganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Nawal Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Sikty P.S. Case No.49 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is recovery of 17.4 litres Nepali liquor from the motorcycle which was being driven by the petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 28.11.2018.. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1166 of 2019(2) dt.21-01-2019 2/2 Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Araria, in connection with Sikty P.S. Case No.49 of 2017, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(4) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offences, after his release on bail the trial court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T