Patna High CourtMJC/2592/2015disposed

Prafull Chandra Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-03-22Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2592 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15926 of 2012 ====================================================== Prafull Chandra Singh Son of Late Raghav Singh Resident of Village & P.O. - Biswaniya, P.S.-Darauli, Dist.-Siwan .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Kumar Vinod Narayan Singh Son of not known to the petitioner, The Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Budh Marg, Patna

3. Devnath Ram, Son of not known to the petitioner, the District Education Officer, Siwan

4. Anil Kumar Singh Son of not known to the petitioner, the Headmaster, Smt. Lalita Devi Project Girls High School, Darauli, Siwan

5. Mr. R.B. Chaudhary son of not known to the petitioner, the then Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tej Bahadur Singh, Sr. Adv. Smt. Shashi Priya Pathak For the Respondent- State : Mr. Sunil Kumar, GA-12 For the Opposite Party No.5 : Mr. Ram Kishore Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-03-2017 The order dated 1.8.2014 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 15926 of 2012, violation of which has been complained of in this contempt application, appears to have been substantially complied with, after having gone through the show cause reply filed on behalf of the Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, by issuing an order dated 17th March, 2017. Learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has, however, raised certain issues in relation to the

Patna High Court MJC No.2592 of 2015 (9) dt.22-03-2017 2/2 petitioner's legal rights, which has not been duly considered by the Director, Secondary Education, in correctness of the said order. This Court cannot look into such aspect of the matter in a contempt proceeding. The petitioner will free to challenge the said order, as he may be advised.

This application stands dismissed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) BTiwary/- U