← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32644/2025allowed

Sanjay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-22Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32644 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-391 Year-2024 Thana- RANIYATALAB District- Patna ====================================================== Sanjay Yadav Son of Pahalwan Yadav Resident of Village- Jiten Chapra, P.S.- Rani Talab, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rakesh Bihari Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-05-2025 Heard Mr. Rakesh Bihari Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sucheta Yadav, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Rani Talab P.S. Case No. 391 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that altogether 25 liters of illicit country made liquor was recovered from an open place.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the as per the FIR, the alleged recovery does not belongs to the petitioner. The petitioner was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32644 of 2025(2) dt.22-05-2025 2/2 named by the co-villagers. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 18.02.2025.

5. The application for bail is vehemently opposed by learned APP for the State and submits the petitioner is having more criminal antecedents but the learned counsel for the petitioner has stated that he has filed supplementary affidavit, in which, he has disclosed that that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of six cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge Excise, Danapur in connection with Rani Talab P.S. Case No. 391 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T