Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26615 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-144 Year-2015 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka ====================================================== Manoj Yadav, S/o Suresh Yadav, Resident of Village- Shrirampur, P.S.- Nathnagar, Dist.- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sudhir Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 01-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rajaon P.S. Case no.144 of 2015, registered under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that on his collecting a sum of Rs.2.5 lacs which were the sale proceeds for sale of medicine and while the informant was returning along with his staff, four accused persons on two motorcycles stopped him and on the point of pistol looted him of the bag containing the said amount.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. was registered against unknown. The name of the petitioner transpired in course of investigation in the confessional statement of a co-accused made before police.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26615 of 2026(4) dt.01-07-2026 2/3 Neither any incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner's possession nor has the petitioner been put on T.I. Parade inspite of his being in custody since 16.12.2025. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State who submits that in an F.I.R. registered in the year 2015, the petitioner could be taken into custody only on 16.12.2025.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner as noted herein above, no incriminating article having been recovered from the petitioner's possession and charge-sheet having been submitted in the case without putting the petitioner on T.I. Parade inspite of his being in custody since 16.12.2025, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Rajaon P.S. Case no.144 of 2015, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Banka on the following conditions :- (I) The petitioner shall remain properly represented in the learned trial Court on each date of the case/trial and shall
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26615 of 2026(4) dt.01-07-2026 3/3 cooperate in the trial.
(II) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court as and when directed by the learned trial Court. (III) In case, the learned trial Court is of the opinion that the case/trial is being delayed due to non-cooperation on part of the petitioner, the learned trial Court may cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and take him into custody till conclusion of the trial.
(Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U T