Randhir Jha @ Guddu Jha @ Randhir D Jha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25856 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-210 Year-2023 Thana- BISFI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Randhir Jha @ Guddu Jha @ Randhir D Jha S/o- Late DEvchandra Jha R/oVillage Sohans, P.S. Bisfi (Patauna), District-Mahdubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Sudish Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Ms. Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-08-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504, 506, 384 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per prosecution case, this petitioner, along with other accused person, demanded extortion from informant and also assaulted him by means of iron rod, causing injury on head.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. As a matter of fact, petitioner is a business man and stays at Mumbai with his wife and two children. It is further submitted that though in the F.I.R. it is alleged that petitioner assaulted informant by means of iron rod
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25856 of 2024(5) dt.07-08-2024 2/3 causing injury on head but perusal of the impugned order would manifest that the same records that the injury was caused by sharp edged weapon, which belies the allegation of assault by means of iron rod. The present case is counter-blast of Bisfi P.S. Case No. 215 of 2023 which has been instituted by mother of this petitioner against the informant and others wherein it is alleged that the present informant, along with other accused persons, forcibly entered the house of this petitioner, assaulted him and also took away gold jewellery. Petitioner claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, case and counter-case between the parties and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Madhubani, in connection with Bisfi P.S. Case No. 210 of 2023, subject to condition as laid
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25856 of 2024(5) dt.07-08-2024 3/3 down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T