Md. Farook And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.79720 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-811 Year-2018 Thana- SITAMARHI District- Sitamarhi ======================================================
1. Md. Farook, son of Md. Sahid
2. Md. Meraj @ Md. Mustafa, Son of Md. Farook
3. Md. Seraj @ Md. Saraj, Son of Md. Farook
4. Md. Israj @ Md. Harshraj @ Md. Isran, Son of Md. Farook, all Residents of Village - Murlichak, Ward no.3, P.S. and District - Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 20-02-2019 Petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 811 of 2018 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 379 and 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the son of the informant when he objected to the playing of gambling by the accused persons and further allegation is that they have tried to disrobe the informant.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that they have falsely been implicated in this case and the allegation is false and concocted and moreover petitioner No.1 is own Bhaisur of th e informant.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.79720 of 2018(3) dt.20-02-2019 2/2 Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, let petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the receipt of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 811 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U T