Ramagya Sharma And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.26933 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -176 Year- 2016 Thana -PAHARPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Ramagya Sharma, son of Dodhi Sharma,
2. Ramdeo Sharma, son of Mangal Sharma,
3. Mahindra Sharma, son of Mangal Sharma,
4. Gagan Sharma @ Dadan Sharma, son of Ramdeo Sharma, All are resident of Village- Gana Pipra, Police Station- Paharpur, DistrictEast Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.-7, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Meena Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 12-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Paharpur P.S. Case No. 176 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 380, 354(B), 448, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of Prevention of Witch Practices Act. As per written report, there is specific allegation against Bhairo Sharma and Rajnath Sharma of assaulting and abusing the informant.
There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26933 of 2017 (3) dt.12-07-2017 2/2 Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 176 of 2016, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,
(2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T