Rohit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25000 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-960 Year-2021 Thana- KANKARBAG District- Patna ====================================================== ROHIT KUMAR Son of Sri Mirtunjay Kumar Singh @ Mirtunay Kumar Singh Resident of Gayghat, Purani Kali Mandir, Near B.N. Reo School, P.S.- Alamganj, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-08-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, the informant is running a company in the name and style of Shri Sai Diddh Enterprise which is engaged in collection of insurance money from the customers of LIC. It is further alleged that petitioner went to deposit Rs. 1, 47, 321 in the LIC Office but he did not deposit

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25000 of 2022(2) dt.17-08-2022 2/3 the said money rather he got Rs. 82,000/- transferred in his account and went underground. Lastly, it is further submitted that the petitioner committed cheating with the customers of LIC and misappropriate the said amount.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that the name of the customers has not stated by the informant who had deposit the said money to the informant. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 01.10.2021.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. Charge-sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner. There is no chance of tampering of evidence Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Patna, in connection with Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 960 of 2021.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25000 of 2022(2) dt.17-08-2022 3/3 The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T