Nidu Singh @ Saroj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48642 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -204 Year- 2015 Thana -SAHEBGANJ District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Nidu Singh @ Saroj Kumar, son of Shivjee Singh, resident of village Paharpur Ahlad, P.S.- Sahebganj, District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yugal Kishore, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2/ 02-11-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.

The Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case instituted for the offence under Section(s) 364/34, 302, 201 Indian Penal Code.

Considering that the Petitioner has fair antecedents and there is no eye witness to the actual murder and the Petitioner claims to be a Teacher in Jharkhand State, it is ordered that in the event of surrender/arrest of the Petitioner, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No.204 of 2015, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of `5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, West, Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48642 of 2015 (2) dt.02-11-2015 2/2 438(2) Cr. P. C. and (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner.

The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the Petitioner, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and, if he is, he shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, and (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J) JA/- U T