← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/1684/2024dismissed

Chandan Prasad @ Rishu v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-09Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1684 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2021 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Chandan Prasad @ Rishu Son of Ramesh Prasad Resident of Village/Mohalla- Satuahi Tola Bairgania, P.S. Bairgainia, District- Sitamarhi 2.

Kanhaiya Jaiswal son of Ashok Jaiswal Resident of Village- Durgapath Bairginia, P.S.- Bairginia, District- Sitamarhi 3.

Mukesh Jaiswal Son of Ashok Jaiswal Resident of Village- Durgapath Bairginia, P.S.- Bairginia, District- Sitamarhi 4.

Ashok Jaiswal Son of Late Motilal Jaiswal Resident of Village- Durgapath Bairginia, P.S.- Bairginia, District- Sitamarhi 5.

Mahamaya Prasad Son of Late Shyamnandan Prasad Resident of VillageDurgapath Bairginia, P.S.- Bairginia, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Chuman Paswan Son of Bhulan Hajara Resident of Village/Mohalla- Mohra Tola, Motihari, P.S. Lakhaura (Muffasil), District-East Champaran ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar , Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Spl. PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-08-2024 1 . Heard learned counsel for the appellants and the State .

2. It is submitted by learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State that the prayer for pre-arrest bail of the appellants is not maintainable as cognizance has already been taken by the court below also for the offences punishable under the SC/ST Act. In this regard, reliance is placed in the case of Bachu Das Vs. State of Bihar and others, reported in (2014) 3 Supreme

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1684 of 2024(3) dt.09-08-2024 2/2 Court Cases 471.

3. In view of the aforesaid pronouncement of law rendered by Hon'ble the Supreme Court, appellants prayer of pre-arrest is refused.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T