← Library
Patna High CourtSA/255/1993dfd for non appearance

Ganinath Sah @ Ganinath v. Rambilash Sah

2026-07-16Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

SECOND APPEAL No.255 of 1993 ====================================================== Ganinath Sah @ Ganinath Son of Mahabir Sah, resident of village- Basantpur Patti, Post office- Basantpur Patti, Police Station- Saraiya, DistrictMuzaffarpur. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.1. Jainarain Sah, Son of Late Rambilas Sah, resident of village- Basantpur Patti, Police Station- Saraya, District- Muzaffarpur. 1.2. Bishwanath Sah, Son of Late Rambilas Sah, resident of village- Basantpur Patti, Police Station- Saraya, District- Muzaffarpur. 1.3. Ramnath Sah, Son of Late Rambilas Sah, resident of village- Basantpur Patti, Police Station- Saraya, District- Muzaffarpur. 1.4. Sheonath Sah, Son of Late Rambilas Sah, resident of village- Basantpur Patti, Police Station- Saraya, District- Muzaffarpur. 2.

Jagdish Sah, Son of Haricharan Sah, resident of village- Basantpur Patti, Post office-Basantpur Patti, Police Station- Saraiya, District-Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

None ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 16-07-2026 On two dates i.e., on 19.02.2026 and 06.04.2026, nobody appears on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellant.

2. On perusal of the records, it appears that this second appeal is of the year 1993 and the appellant is absented from two dates and even today, on repeated calls, nobody

Patna High Court SA No.255 of 1993(15) dt.16-07-2026 2/2 appears on behalf of the appellant despite direct notice has been issued to the appellant, so in this circumstances, this second appeal is dismissed for default under Order XLI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

(Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Anand Kr.

U