Binod Kumar And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5827 of 1995 ======================================================
1. Binod Kumar Son of Sri Rajendra Prasad, resident of village / Mohalla New Chandmari,
2. Chandshekhar Prasad Son of Sri Kedar Prasad, resident of Village/ Mohalla Gopalpur
3. Ajay Kumar Shrivastava, Son of Sri Kailash Prasad, resident of village / Mohalla Chitawni Amar, All of P.O. and P.S. Motihari, District East Champaran.
4. Rakesh Kumar Verma, Son of Kailash Prasad, resident of village & P.O. Patawra Lal Tola, P.S. Motihari Muffasil.
6. Bipin Prasad son of Sri Rama Prasad, resident of village Madhubani, P.O. and P.S. Sangrampur
6. Rambabu Thakur, Son of Sri Brahmdeo Thakur, resident of village Challaha Mauza, P.O. and P.S. Bangaria.
7. Sanjay Kumar Verma, Son of Sri Raj Kishor Prasad, resident of Mohalla - Thakur Bari, Motihari, P.O. and P.S. Motihari.
8. Akhilesh Kumar Pandey @ Akhilesh Pandey, Son of Sri Basudeo Pandey, resident of Village Kushar, P.O. Turkaulia.
9. Shubha Narayan Jha, Son of Sri Gokhul Jha, resident of village - P.O. and P.S. Motihari
10. Harendra Prasad Son of Sri Jagarnath Prasad resident of village and P.O. Raghunathpur, P. S. Turkaulia.
11. Khublal Singh Son of Sri Bachan Singh, resident of village, P.O.& P.S. Motihari.
12. Shailendra Kumar Srivastava @ Guddu, Son of Sri Staya Narayan Lal Srivastava, resident of village, P.S. and P.O. Motihari.
13. Suresh Singh Son of Sri Raghunath Singh, resident of village Mathiya, P.O. and P.S. Ramgrhwa.
14. Dilip Kumar Verma, Son of Awadh Bihari Prasad, resident of village Gobindapur, P.O. and P.S. Turkaulia.
15. Tapeshwar Prasad Son of Sri Rijhan Raut, resident of village and P.O. Pataura.
16. Krishnandan Yadav, Son of Sri Lalgir Rai, resident of village Chota Bariarpur, P.S. Chitawni, P.O. Motihari.
17. Md. Hasim Son of Sri Makbul Ahmad, resident of village P.S. and P.O. Turkaulia.
18. Md. Kalam Son of Sri Abdul Haphij, resident of village P.S. and P.O. Turkaulia.
19. Ram Nagina Pd. Yadav, Son of Sri Janak Pd. Yadav, resident of village Nawrangia P.S. and P.O. Lakhwra
20. Lalit Mohan Prasad Son of Sri Paras Lal, resident of village/Mohalla Chandmari, P.O. and P.S. Motihari
21. Md. Aobullah Son of Md. Akhtar, resident of village Barharwa Sishan, P.O. and P.S. Dhaka.
22. Raizuddin Son of Dhmad Hussain, resident of village Piprawazid, P.O. and P.S. Dhaka
23. Faizle Haque Son of Md. Sariph, resident of village Piprawazid, P.O.
Patna High Court CWJC No.5827 of 1995 (5) dt.30-01-2015 2/3 and P.S. Dhaka.
24 Jagdish Jha, Son of Sri Parasnath Jha, resident of village Barharwa Sishan, P.O. and P.S. Dhaka
25. Umesh Pd. Son of Bindeshwari Prasad, resident of village Bhalolpur, P.O. and P.S. Dhaka.
26. Anil Kumar Son of Sri Chandrika Prasad, resident of village Sugaun, P.O. and P.S. Sugauli.
27. Surendra Prasad Srivastava Son of Sri Raghunath Prasad, resident of village - P.O. Patawra, P.S. Motihari.
28. Jakir Hussan Son of Jikurrullah Hussen, resident of village Piprawazid, P.O. and P.S. Dhaka.
29. Md. Isham Son of Md. Kamuddin, resident of Mohalla Balua Tal, P.O. and P.S. Motihari, All District of East Champaran .... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Collector-cum-District Registrar, East Champaran at Motihari.
3. The District Sub-Registrar at Motihari, District East Champaran.
4. The Inspector General of Registration, Bihar Patna, Secretariate No.2, P.S. Sachivalaya, District Patna.
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : None For the Respondents : Mr. Mayank Rukhiyar, AC to GA ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 30-01-2015 No one appears for the petitioners.
Learned counsel for the State points out that the validity of the very same provision of Sections 68A and 68B of the Registration Act, 1908, as inserted by the Registration (Bihar Amendment) Act, 1991, has been held to be valid and not violative of Articles 254 (2), 14 and 19(1) (g) of the Constitution in the case of Awadhesh Tiwari & others Vs. The State of Bihar : 1998 (3) PLJR 665.
Patna High Court CWJC No.5827 of 1995 (5) dt.30-01-2015 3/3 In the above circumstances, the writ application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/- U