Tuntun Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27754 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2022 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran ====================================================== TUNTUN SAHANI SON OF BILASH SAHNI R/O VILLAGE- JAGTIYA, P.S.- PAKARIDAYAL, DISTRICT- EAST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) and 30(c) of the Bihar Excise Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of two cases and allegation is of recovery of 34 liters of liquor along with 2000 liters of raw material from bank of a river.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession, it is next submitted that even the alleged is from a place which is accessible to public at large and the petitioner, because of his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27754 of 2023(2) dt.17-05-2023 2/2 antecedents came to be implicated based on the secret information.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Pakaridayal P.S. Case No. 266 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to make rectification in Para 1 of the anticipatory bail application.

Permission is accorded.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T