← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2914/2014disposed

Awdhesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-08-03Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2914 of 2014 ===================================================

1. Awdhesh Kumar Son Of Sri Ramadhar Ram Resident Of Village - Chargaha, P.O. Sabeya, P.S. Tukauli, District - East Champaran, Chairman - Cum - Pramukh Of Turkaulia Block Teacher Appointment Committee, District - East Champaran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar through The Chief Secretary Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Secretary Cum Commissioner, Human Resources Department Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, Motihari, District - East Champaran

4. The District Education Officer, Motihari, District - East Champaran

5. The District Programme Officer ( Est. ), Motihari District - East Champaran

6. The District Teacher Appointment Appellate Authority Motihari District - East Champaran through Its Member

7. The Block Development Officer Block Turkaulia, District - East Champaran

8. The Block Educational and Extension Officer, Block Turkaulia District East Champaran

9. Gufrana Nahid Daughter Of Enamul Haque Resident Of Mohalla - Bhawanipur Zirat, P.O. Motihari, P.S.- Chhatauni, District - East Champaran

10. Nasim Mushar Son Of Md. Bakaullah Resident Of Darul Baka, Mathia Zirat, P.O. Motihari Block Motihari District - East Champaran .... .... Respondent/s =================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Anis Akhtar, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Priyadarshi Matri Sharan, AC to AAG15 =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 03-08-2016 Heard Md. Anis Akhtar for the petitioner and Mr.

Patna High Court CWJC No.2914 of 2014 dt.03-08-2016 2/2 Priyadarshi Matri Sharan AC to AAG-15 for the State. The petitioner is the Chairman of the Selection Committee and has filed the present writ petition to quash the order passed by the District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, ( for short 'the Tribunal') Motihari in case no. 888 of 2013. A counter affidavit on behalf of the concerned respondent is filed annexing therewith the resignation letter submitted by respondent no.10 from the post of Block Teacher. The counsel for the petitioner, in view of the aforesaid fact, states that now since there is no two claimants for the post, the writ application has lost its relevance as it was presented with the grievance that in the light of the order of the Tribunal there are two claimants for the post in- question.

The writ application is disposed of.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U