← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17744/2015dismissed

Smt. Pratima Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-10-05Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17744 of 2015 ====================================================== Smt. Pratima Devi Wife of Ramesh Paswan Resident of Village - Bank P.S. Akori Gola, District - Rohtas, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Development Commissioner, Rohtas 3.

The District Magistrate Cum President, District Health Society, Rohtas at Sasaram 4.

In Charge Officer, District Public Grievance Unit 5.

The Civil Surgeon Cum Member Secretary, District Health Socieity, Rohtas 6.

The Incharge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre Akori Gola, Rohtas Sasaram 7.

Anita Devi Wife of Ajit Kumar Singh Resident of village P.O. Bank, Akori Gola, District - Rohtas ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajesh Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Nalinvilochan Tiwary, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 05-10-2023

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1.That this is an application is being filed for issuance of an appropriate writ/writs/ direction/directions to the Respondents to quash the Letter No. 323 dated 23.7.2015 passed by Incharge Medical officer, Primary Health Centre Akori Gola (Respondent no.6) and letter No.2-1591 dated 11.7.15 and letter No. 1615 dated 16.7.15 passed by Respondent No. 4 and 5 whereby and whereunder the selection of petitioner has been cancelled from

Patna High Court CWJC No.17744 of 2015(2) dt.05-10-2023 2/2 the Post of ASHA facilitator without following due procedure and guidelines and without giving opportunity of hearing and also violation of natural justice."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, for redressal of her aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U