Pramod Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24361 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-518 Year-2022 Thana- MUZAFFARPUR TOWN DistrictMuzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

Pramod Kumar S/O Late Styadev Prasad Resident Of Village- Sikandarpur, P.S.- Town, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur. 2.

Sangita Gupta S/O Pramod Kumar Resident Of Village- Sikandarpur, P.S.- Town, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

3.

Rajeev Kumar S/O Ram Lakhan Prasad Resident Of Village- Sikandarpur, P.S.- Town, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur. 4.

Sonu Kumar S/O Upendra Prasad Resident Of Village- Sikandarpur, P.S.- Town, Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gauri Shankar Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 470, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per FIR, the petitioners cheated the informant by making forged document.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that both the parties are close relatives and due to dirty local politics, this case has been lodged against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24361 of 2023(2) dt.07-07-2023 2/2 petitioners. He submits that the petitioners have no knowledge about the cancellation of power of Attorney given by the informant. He submits that the dispute between the parties is purely civil in nature. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Muzaffarpur Town P.S. Case No. 518 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438

(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T