Tufani Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23461 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-569 Year-2025 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== Tufani Ray Son of Fudina Ray @ Phudena Ray R/O Vill.- Ram Sagar, P.S.- Barhara, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shivam Aniket, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 569 of 2025 dated 14.07.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) of B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has alleged that a motorcycle, which was standing in the name of his wife, was stolen from the market when it was parked.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that petitioner is not named in this case. It has further been submitted that petitioner was not identified as the person who was committing theft of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23461 of 2026(3) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 motorcycle. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that petitioner is in custody since 25.08.2025 and the case is triable by the learned Magistrate. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that charge-sheet has been submitted in this case and the motorcycle, which was recovered from the petitioner, belongs to the petitioner. It has further been submitted that although petitioner has been made accused in some other cases but he is on bail except one case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Heard the parties and perused the record.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Danapur in connection with Bihta P.S. Case No. 569 of 2025.

8. The application stands allowed.

(Praveen Kumar, J) shivam/- U T