← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24141/2022bail granted

Neelam Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-10-10Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24141 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2020 Thana- MAHILA THANA District- Begusarai ====================================================== NEELAM DEVI W/O NIPENDRA SINGH R/o village- Vishnupur Chand, P.S.- Barauni (Chakia O.P.), Distt.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sarita Kumari D/o Makshudan Singh @ Madhusudansingh R/o villageBihat, Ward No. 02, P.S.- Barauni, Distt.- Begusarai ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shubhesh Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 10-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case no. 26 of 2020 instituted for the offence under Sections 323, 341, 504, 506, 498A, 325/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with her other family members has tortured in various ways to the informant mentally and physically. It is further alleged that petitioner has assaulted the informant as a result of which her finger of right hand got fractured.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24141 of 2022(2) dt.10-10-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is mother-in-law of the informant and has been falsely implicated in this case. She has no concern with the daily activity of the informant and her husband and she is living separately. The sole responsibility to take care of wife is upon husband of the informant and not against his family members.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Mahila P.S. Case no. 26 of 2020, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Begusarai subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U T