← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9397/2020disposed

Bhadra Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2021-06-28Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9397 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Bhadra Ram Singh (Male), aged about 65 years Son of Borhan Singh Resident of Ward No. 40, Mohalla- Sarvoday Nagar, P.S.- Town Begusarai, District- Begusarai.

2.

Pawan Devi (Female) aged 65 years, W/o Bhadra Ram Singh Resident of Ward No. 40, Mohalla- Sarvoday Nagar, P.S.- Town Begusarai, DistrictBegusarai. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, The Department of Registration, Excise and Prohibition of Liquor Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Regional Officer, Bihar National Highway Authority of India, 1st Floor, D/63, Srikrishna Puri, Patna.

4.

The Divisional Commissioner Munger Division, Munger. 5.

The Collector-cum- District Magistrate Begusarai. 6.

The Project Director NHAI Unit, Begusarai.

7.

The District Land Acquisition Officer Begusarai. 8.

The Additional Collector Land Reforms, Begusarai. 9.

The Sub Divisional Officer Begusarai.

10.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms Begusarai.

11.

The District Sub- Registrar Begusarai.

12.

The Circle Officer Begusarai.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Yogendra Chandra Verma, Sr. Advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondents :

Mr .Lalit Kishore ( AG ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 28-06-2021 Heard Mr. Yogesh Chandra Verma, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners as well as learned

Patna High Court CWJC No.9397 of 2020(3) dt.28-06-2021 2/3 counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. The grievance of the petitioners in the present writ application is that the land is commercial in nature and it was acquired for construction of Toll Plaza. Instead of awarding compensation as commercial land, the respondents have not paid compensation of Do Fasla land, such action of the respondents is arbitrary.

Learned senior counsel for the petitioners further submits that till date the petitioners have not received any compensation.

In the event the petitioners have not received any compensation, the respondents are required to pay the amount of compensation as determined by them as early as possible preferably within a period of six weeks. In the event, the petitioners are aggrieved by quantum of compensation and categorization of land of the petitioners as Do Fasla land instead of commercial land, liberty shall be available to the petitioners to approach the competent authority in accordance with law who shall look into the grievance of the petitioners and pass appropriate order within a maximum period of four months from the date of filing of objection by the petitioners along with a copy of this order.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9397 of 2020(3) dt.28-06-2021 3/3 With the aforesaid, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) BT/- U