Dr. Janak Lali Sinha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20068 of 2014 =========================================

1. Dr. Janak Lali Sinha, w/o Late Sadhu Sinha, r/o New Area Sikandarpur, P.O. & P.S.- Sadar, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

3. Director of Provident Fund, Directorate Provident Fund Bihar, Patna.

4. District Provident Fund Officer, Munger, Fort Area, Munger.

5. District Provident Fund Officer, Muzaffarpur.

6. District Provident Fund Officer, Aurangabad.

7. Civil Surgeon, Aurangabad.

8. The Civil Surgeon, Lakhisarai.

9. The Civil Surgeon, Muzaffarpur.

10. Superintendent, Sadar Hospital, Muzaffarpur.

11. The In charge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Aurai, Muzaffarpur.

12. The In charge Medical Officer, Referral Hospital, Barahiya, District- Lakhisarai.

.... .... Respondent/s ========================================= Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhirendra Nath Jha, Adv. For the State : Mr. Kumar Kamalnayan, AC to SC-33 =========================================

CORAM:

HONOURABLE MR.

JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH

Patna High Court CWJC No.20068 of 2014 dt.22-07-2016 2/3 ORAL JUDGMENT & ORDER Date: 22-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AC to SC-33 for the respondents-State of Bihar.

2. This application has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents-State of Bihar to pay the petitioner the Provident Fund dues and arrears of salary for the period 1999 to 2002.

3. It is submitted on behalf of the respondentsState of Bihar that nothing is due to be paid to the petitioner. It has also been submitted that arrears of salary has also been paid to the petitioner after filing of this application.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute that the petitioner has been paid the General Provident Fund amount.

5. The grievance of the petitioner relating to payment of salary of arrears, for the period 1999 to 2002, cannot be gone into in the present proceeding, particularly in view of the stand taken on behalf of the respondentsState of Bihar that the said amount has already been paid to the petitioner.

6. Considering the submission, as above, this

Patna High Court CWJC No.20068 of 2014 dt.22-07-2016 3/3 application stands disposed of.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Praveen-II/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 22.07.2016 Transmission Date N/A