Prasant Kumar Rai @ Nanhe Rai @ Nanhe And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 34565 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -46 Year- 2016 Thana -KATEYA District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Prasant Kumar Rai @ Nanhe Rai @ Nanhe S/o Bhuneshwar Roy

2. Ravi Bhusan Roy @ Vicky Roy S/o Sunil Roy Both resident of Village- Belhidih, P.S.- Kateya, District- Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2.

08-09-2016 Heard Sri Amit Kumar Rakesh, learned counsel for petitioners and Sri Binay Krishna, learned Special Public Prosecutor.

Two petitioners, who are named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation apprehending their arrest in Kateya P.S. Case No. 46 of 2016, G.R. No. 594 of 2016 registered for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 354, 354(B), 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i)(x)(xi) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, have prayed for grant of bail in the event of their arrest or surrender. It was submitted by learned counsel for petitioners that in village politics, petitioners have been made accused, however; after going through the F.I.R. itself, the Court is satisfied

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34565 of 2016 (2) dt.08-09-2016 2/2 that it is not a case for grant of anticipatory bail. Dismissed.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U T