← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24426/2025bail granted

Akash Kumar @ Akashdeep Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-19Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24426 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2023 Thana- TEKARI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Akash Kumar @ Akashdeep Kumar S/o Vinod Prasad R/o VillageNIshurpur, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya 2.

Vinod Prasad S/o Late Sita Ram Singh @ Late Sita Ram Mahto R/o VillageNIshurpur, P.S.- Tekari, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-05-2025 Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 290 of 2023, F.I.R. dated 05.05.2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 308, 379, 354, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Allegation against the petitioners are of assaulting the informant and his family members due to which they sustained injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24426 of 2025(2) dt.19-05-2025 2/3 the present case. He further submits that the present case is counter blast of Tekari P.S. Case No. 268 of 2023 lodged by the side of the petitioners against the informant and his family members. He further submits that from perusal of the F.I.R. it appears that there is no specific allegation of any assault or overt act attributed against these petitioners rather there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including these petitioners that they have assaulted to the informant and their family members.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners and submits that the petitioners carries two more cases other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph-3 of the bail petition that the petitioners are on bail in the pending matters.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no specific allegation attributed against these petitioners and there is case and counter case between the parties, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. VI, Gaya in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 290 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24426 of 2025(2) dt.19-05-2025 3/3 under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/ Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 and with other following conditions :-

(1) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Ibrar//- U