Brij Kishore Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21335 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2018 Thana- KANGLI District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

BRIJ KISHORE SINGH Son of Late Devendra Singh Resident of VillageDaptad Majhariya, P.S-Kangali, District-West Champaran. 2.

Santosh Singh Son of Late Devendra Singh Resident of Village-Daptad Majhariya, P.S-Kangali, District-West Champaran. 3.

Ramayan Singh Son of Late Devendra Singh Resident of Village-Daptad Majhariya, P.S-Kangali, District-West Champaran. 4.

Shiv Shankar Singh Son of Late Kapildeo Singh Resident of Village-Daptad Majhariya, P.S-Kangali, District-West Champaran. 5.

Satdeo Singh @ Satyadeo Singh Son of Late Kapildeo Singh Resident of Village-Daptad Majhariya, P.S-Kangali, District-West Champaran. 6.

Bijendra Singh @ Brijendra Singh Son of Satdeo Singh @ Satyadeo Singh Resident of Village-Daptad Majhariya, P.S-Kangali, District-West Champaran.

7.

Pappu Singh Son of Ramayan Singh Resident of Village-Daptad Majhariya, P.S-Kangali, District-West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Murli Dhar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 05-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 IPC registered in connection with Kangali P.S.Case No. 18/2018.

3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of petty dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties. The accusations are general and omnibus in nature and the thrust of accusation is against other co-accused persons. The injuries are simple in nature. The petitioners claim clean

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21335 of 2019(2) dt.05-04-2019 2/2 antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Mr. A. Kumar, learned J.M. Ist Class, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Kangali P.S.Case No. 18/2018 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions:

i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners. ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iv. The petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T