Kundan Tanti v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35615 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2020 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Kundan Tanti, son of Jugal Tanti.

2.

Sanjeet Kumar Tanti @ Sanjeev Tanti, Son of Kapil Tanti. Both are resident of Village - Jai Nagar, P.S.- Dobhi, Distt.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Kunwar Narayan Jamuar, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Ms. Pushpa Sinha 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 127 of 2020 for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 325, 307, 354 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

There is case and counter case from both the sides. The injury sustained by the injured is simple in nature and moreover, it has been submitted that compromise has taken place between the parties.

Considering the aforesaid facts, this bail

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35615 of 2021(2) dt.13-04-2022 2/2 application is allowed.

Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest/surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya, in connection with Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 127 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

However, at the time of accepting the bail bonds of the petitioners, the Court below shall verify from the informant about the genuineness of the compromise. If the informant supports the compromise then, the bail bonds of the petitioners shall be accepted by the Court below. If the informant does not support the compromise, in such a situation, the Court below shall not accept the bail bonds of the petitioner and they shall be taken into custody.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) pawan/- U T