Rajesh Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar Through K.K. Pathak

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1142 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12713 of 2019 ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar Thakur Son of Late Binod Kumar Thakur, Resident of Village and P.O. - Shasan Police Station - Hasanpur, District - Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through K.K. Pathak fathers name not known to the petitioner, the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, New Secretariat, Patna.

2.

Pro. Shailendra Kumar Chaturvedi fathers name not known to the petitioner, the Vice Chancellor, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara. 3.

Dr. Anwar Imam, father's name not known to the petitioner, the Registrar, Veer Kunwar Singh University, Ara.

4.

Dr. Subash Chandra, father's name not known to the petitioner, the Principal M.V. College, Buxar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Prabhakar Jha, GP-27 For the Resp Nos.2 &3 :

Mr. Bimal Kishor Singh, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Prasad Chaudhary, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-07-2025 Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned Advocate for the petitioner fairly contended that in compliance with the order of this Court, substantive retiral/pensionary benefits of the petitioner have been paid. It has been informed to this Court that a contempt application arising out of the order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 6257 of 2019 is pending consideration before the learned Division Bench of this Court and in case other identically situated persons are accorded some benefit(s), the petitioner may be given liberty to approach the concerned authority for identical

Patna High Court MJC No.1142 of 2024(5) dt.04-07-2025 2/2 relief(s)/benefit(s).

2. Learned Advocate for the State and the University submitted that the order under contempt has already been given effect to and complied in its letter and spirit.

3. In view of the submissions set forth by the learned Advocate for the respective parties, the present contempt petition stands closed with liberty to the petitioner that in case a fresh cause of action arises, he may approach before the concerned authority.

(Harish Kumar, J) rohit/- U